<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrate National Medical Transcriptionist Week May 18-24, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Yakkings of a Medical Transcriptionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:20:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/#comment-13577</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtherald.com/?p=493#comment-13577</guid>
		<description>Yes.  However, my point is that the remaining 3% bloopers produced are drastic errors that no medical document produced by voice recognition softwares are reliable that their outputs can be left without medical transcriptionist/editor intervention!!  It is just a tool to save you lot of keystrokes.  See such a sample collection of speech recognition (or wreckognition rather) bloopers &lt;a href=&quot;http://medicaltranscriptionforyou.blogspot.com/search/label/bloopers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  However, my point is that the remaining 3% bloopers produced are drastic errors that no medical document produced by voice recognition softwares are reliable that their outputs can be left without medical transcriptionist/editor intervention!!  It is just a tool to save you lot of keystrokes.  See such a sample collection of speech recognition (or wreckognition rather) bloopers <a href="http://medicaltranscriptionforyou.blogspot.com/search/label/bloopers" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/#comment-13576</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtherald.com/?p=493#comment-13576</guid>
		<description>Thank You Raj. Wish you the same.  I agree with you Raj about Speech Recognition Engines.  Now there are very efficient such engines which generate 97% accurate medical records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You Raj. Wish you the same.  I agree with you Raj about Speech Recognition Engines.  Now there are very efficient such engines which generate 97% accurate medical records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 322/327 objects using disk: basic

Served from: mtherald.com @ 2012-05-16 23:28:23 -->
