<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Celebrate National Medical Transcriptionist Week May 18-24, 2009</title> <atom:link href="http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/</link> <description>The Miscellaneous Yakkings of a Medical Transcriptionist</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:23:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Raj</title><link>http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/#comment-13577</link> <dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:21:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mtherald.com/?p=493#comment-13577</guid> <description>Yes.  However, my point is that the remaining 3% bloopers produced are drastic errors that no medical document produced by voice recognition softwares are reliable that their outputs can be left without medical transcriptionist/editor intervention!!  It is just a tool to save you lot of keystrokes.  See such a sample collection of speech recognition (or wreckognition rather) bloopers &lt;a href=&quot;http://medicaltranscriptionforyou.blogspot.com/search/label/bloopers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  However, my point is that the remaining 3% bloopers produced are drastic errors that no medical document produced by voice recognition softwares are reliable that their outputs can be left without medical transcriptionist/editor intervention!!  It is just a tool to save you lot of keystrokes.  See such a sample collection of speech recognition (or wreckognition rather) bloopers <a
href="http://medicaltranscriptionforyou.blogspot.com/search/label/bloopers" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stuart</title><link>http://mtherald.com/celebrate-national-medical-transcriptionist-week-may-18-24-2009/#comment-13576</link> <dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mtherald.com/?p=493#comment-13576</guid> <description>Thank You Raj. Wish you the same.  I agree with you Raj about Speech Recognition Engines.  Now there are very efficient such engines which generate 97% accurate medical records.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You Raj. Wish you the same.  I agree with you Raj about Speech Recognition Engines.  Now there are very efficient such engines which generate 97% accurate medical records.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 308/312 objects using disk: basic

Served from: mtherald.com @ 2012-02-09 13:41:30 -->
